Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz ditch their matching face masks

Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz share a sweet smooch during New York trip as they ditch their matching face masks amid coronavirus outbreak

They were seen wearing large black face masks for their flight to New York City as the global coronavirus outbreak continues to send panic across the planet.

But now safely on land again, Brooklyn Beckham and his girlfriend Nicola Peltz ditched their precautionary accessories, as they enjoyed a day out together in the Big Apple on Tuesday morning.

Mask-free Brooklyn, who turned 21 last week, packed on the PDA with American actress Nicola, 25, as they shared a sweet kiss during their low-key stroll.  

Maskless: Brooklyn Beckham and his girlfriend Nicola Peltz ditched their precautionary accessories as they enjoyed a day out together in the Big Apple on Tuesday morning

Cutting a typically stylish figure, the celebrity offspring wore a petrol blue jacket over a black top and matching jeans, adding white trainers to the look.  

Actress Nicola, 25, also opted for a casual look for the day in a a black top and matching leather jacket along with a pair of jeans.

She wore her blonde locks loosely around her shoulders and was seen animatedly chatting to someone on her phone on speakerphone. 

The TV star took to her Instagram Stories and shared a snap from the plane previously, flashing the camera a piece sign as she kicked back in her chair. 

Kiss like no one is watching: Mask-free Brooklyn, who turned 21 last week, packed on the PDA with American actress Nicola, 25, as they shared a sweet smooch during their low-key stroll

Lovebirds: The couple gazed adoringly at each other as they walked across the streets of the fashion capital arm-in-arm


 Playing it safe: They were seen wearing large black face masks for their flight to New York City the day before, as the global coronavirus outbreak continues to send panic across the planet

Effortlessly cool: Cutting a typically stylish figure, the celebrity offspring wore a petrol blue jacket over a black top and matching jeans, adding white trainers to the look 

Casual: Nicola also opted for a casual look for the day in a a black top and matching leather jacket along with a pair of jeans

Loved up: The couple put on a cosy display as they strolled through the city hand in hand


Relationship: Brooklyn and Nicola recently enjoyed a romantic trip to Paris for Fashion Week 

Neither were taking any risks, as the COVID-19 drama continues to escalate, with the USA’s current coronavirus tally at 1,015 cases, which has resulted in 31 deaths. 

The fledgling couple might have been better of staying put in the UK, with only 383 cases confirmed, of which 6 patients have died.

Just days ago, the pair were in the Cotswolds at the Beckham’s country pile, where David and Victoria threw a 21st bash for their eldest son.

The party saw the likes of Victoria’s Spice Girls co-stars Geri Horner and Emma Bunton in attendance, and featured a performance from Stormzy.

Chatty: Nicola wore her blonde locks loosely around her shoulders and was seen animatedly chatting to someone on her phone on speakerphone


The party’s over: Brooklyn turned 21 last week, with the Beckhams celebrating at a lavish bash in the Cotswolds on Saturday night

Meanwhile, someone who is infected with the coronavirus can spread it with just a simple cough or a sneeze, scientists say.

4,378 people with the virus are now confirmed to have died globally, while 121,238 have been infected.

England’s chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, said on Tuesday that it is ‘highly likely’ that the virus is now spreading inside the UK among people who haven’t traveled anywhere. 

Travel: They touched down at JFK airport in New York City clad in masks on Monday

Flight: Nicola took to her Instagram Stories and shared a snap from the plane, flashing the camera a piece sign

He added that more cases will appear in the UK and it is unlikely that authorities will be able to prevent an outbreak at some point.

But Professor Whitty said he did not expect cases to be worse among healthcare workers because they would be told by bosses not to work through illness and to go home at the first sight of an infection.

Despite the precaution, one medical expert recently told MailOnline that masks ‘cannot’ protect against the virus and that wearing them may even make it worse.

Meanwhile Public Health England has warned that there is ‘very little evidence’ that masks are effective ‘outside of clinical settings’ such as hospitals.

Yet recent testing by the Health and Safety Executive has found that any kind of protection is better than nothing.


Living it up: The couple’s trip comes soon after Brooklyn’s 21st birthday party, which was reported to have cost £100,000

Big sister goals: The Transformers: Age of Extinction star has blended well into the family as she shared a hug with the youngest child of the Beckham brood, Harper, eight

The way you wear a mask is crucially important, academics say, because unless it is tight to the nose and mouth contaminated sneezes and coughs will get through – or linger on the surface.

Professor Brendan Wren from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that masks will not stop people from becoming infected and may even worsen its spread.

He said: ‘The masks won’t protect against the virus because it’s so tiny. It is thousands of times smaller than bacteria.

‘I don’t think they do any good. They are smaller than air particles for pollution that we worry about. It will simply be breathed in.’

He added that masks may make the spread of the virus more likely if they become damp.


Happy birthday! Brooklyn was treated to a concert by rapper Stormzy (pictured) and monogrammed drinks as he let his hair down until 6am

‘They may make matters worse, [such as] if they become damp. If you have a cold or sneezing, sneezing into a mask can make matters worse.’

He added: ‘The main purpose is a psychological thing they make people more aware but physically they are not a prevention’.

Dr Stephen Griffin, Associate Professor Section of Infection & Immunity, University of Leeds, said: ‘Standard facemasks provide relatively little protection from respiratory aerosols – they can stop larger droplets and some studies have estimated an approx. 5-fold protection versus no barrier alone.

Also, once they are worn for a time, they become moistened and protection diminishes further. Exhaled droplets also reduce in size quickly by evaporation, and of course virus particles are far smaller than the fibre mesh in these sorts of masks.

‘However, wearing a mask can reduce the propensity for people to touch their faces, which happens many more times a day than we all realise and is a major source of infection without proper hand hygiene.

Close: The couple were over the moon as they posed for a snap with his younger brother Romeo, 17

They are also useful for people that are themselves symptomatic in stopping coughs and sneezes, primarily by encouraging good ‘etiquette’, i.e. catch it, bin it, kill it…

‘There are higher specification masks that contain filters and, when properly fitted and sealed, provide significantly better protection. However, these aren’t as easy to come by and are obviously more expensive.’

The World Health Organisation said masks had to be combined with good hand hygiene and other measures for them to have any positive effect.

Protect: Rita Ora also wore a face mask as she shared a snap from her recent travels 

They recommended that masks should only be worn by those with a cough, fever, or who people who have difficulty breathing.

They added: ‘The main purpose is a psychological thing they make people more aware but physically they are not a prevention.’

A coronavirus is a type of virus which can cause illness in animals and people. Viruses break into cells inside their host and use them to reproduce itself and disrupt the body’s normal functions.

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE CORONAVIRUS?

Someone who is infected with the coronavirus can spread it with just a simple cough or a sneeze, scientists say.

More than 4,000 people with the virus are now confirmed to have died and more than 110,000 have been infected. Here’s what we know so far:

What is the coronavirus? 

A coronavirus is a type of virus which can cause illness in animals and people. Viruses break into cells inside their host and use them to reproduce itself and disrupt the body’s normal functions. Coronaviruses are named after the Latin word ‘corona’, which means crown, because they are encased by a spiked shell which resembles a royal crown.

The coronavirus from Wuhan is one which has never been seen before this outbreak. It has been named SARS-CoV-2 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The name stands for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2.

Experts say the bug, which has killed around one in 50 patients since the outbreak began in December, is a ‘sister’ of the SARS illness which hit China in 2002, so has been named after it.

The disease that the virus causes has been named COVID-19, which stands for coronavirus disease 2019.

Dr Helena Maier, from the Pirbright Institute, said: ‘Coronaviruses are a family of viruses that infect a wide range of different species including humans, cattle, pigs, chickens, dogs, cats and wild animals. 

‘Until this new coronavirus was identified, there were only six different coronaviruses known to infect humans. Four of these cause a mild common cold-type illness, but since 2002 there has been the emergence of two new coronaviruses that can infect humans and result in more severe disease (Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronaviruses). 

‘Coronaviruses are known to be able to occasionally jump from one species to another and that is what happened in the case of SARS, MERS and the new coronavirus. The animal origin of the new coronavirus is not yet known.’ 

The first human cases were publicly reported from the Chinese city of Wuhan, where approximately 11million people live, after medics first started publicly reporting infections on December 31.

By January 8, 59 suspected cases had been reported and seven people were in critical condition. Tests were developed for the new virus and recorded cases started to surge.

The first person died that week and, by January 16, two were dead and 41 cases were confirmed. The next day, scientists predicted that 1,700 people had become infected, possibly up to 7,000.

Just a week after that, there had been more than 800 confirmed cases and those same scientists estimated that some 4,000 – possibly 9,700 – were infected in Wuhan alone. By that point, 26 people had died. 

By January 27, more than 2,800 people were confirmed to have been infected, 81 had died, and estimates of the total number of cases ranged from 100,000 to 350,000 in Wuhan alone.

By January 29, the number of deaths had risen to 132 and cases were in excess of 6,000.  

By February 5, there were more than 24,000 cases and 492 deaths.

By February 11, this had risen to more than 43,000 cases and 1,000 deaths. 

A change in the way cases are confirmed on February 13 – doctors decided to start using lung scans as a formal diagnosis, as well as laboratory tests – caused a spike in the number of cases, to more than 60,000 and to 1,369 deaths.

By February 25, around 80,000 people had been infected and some 2,700 had died. February 25 was the first day in the outbreak when fewer cases were diagnosed within China than in the rest of the world. 

Where does the virus come from?

According to scientists, the virus almost certainly came from bats. Coronaviruses in general tend to originate in animals – the similar SARS and MERS viruses are believed to have originated in civet cats and camels, respectively.

The first cases of COVID-19 came from people visiting or working in a live animal market in Wuhan, which has since been closed down for investigation.

Although the market is officially a seafood market, other dead and living animals were being sold there, including wolf cubs, salamanders, snakes, peacocks, porcupines and camel meat. 

A study by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, published in February 2020 in the scientific journal Nature, found that the genetic make-up virus samples found in patients in China is 96 per cent identical to a coronavirus they found in bats.

However, there were not many bats at the market so scientists say it was likely there was an animal which acted as a middle-man, contracting it from a bat before then transmitting it to a human. It has not yet been confirmed what type of animal this was.

Dr Michael Skinner, a virologist at Imperial College London, was not involved with the research but said: ‘The discovery definitely places the origin of nCoV in bats in China.

‘We still do not know whether another species served as an intermediate host to amplify the virus, and possibly even to bring it to the market, nor what species that host might have been.’  

So far the fatalities are quite low. Why are health experts so worried about it? 

Experts say the international community is concerned about the virus because so little is known about it and it appears to be spreading quickly.

It is similar to SARS, which infected 8,000 people and killed nearly 800 in an outbreak in Asia in 2003, in that it is a type of coronavirus which infects humans’ lungs. It is less deadly than SARS, however, which killed around one in 10 people, compared to approximately one in 50 for COVID-19.

Another reason for concern is that nobody has any immunity to the virus because they’ve never encountered it before. This means it may be able to cause more damage than viruses we come across often, like the flu or common cold.

Speaking at a briefing in January, Oxford University professor, Dr Peter Horby, said: ‘Novel viruses can spread much faster through the population than viruses which circulate all the time because we have no immunity to them.

‘Most seasonal flu viruses have a case fatality rate of less than one in 1,000 people. Here we’re talking about a virus where we don’t understand fully the severity spectrum but it’s possible the case fatality rate could be as high as two per cent.’

If the death rate is truly two per cent, that means two out of every 100 patients who get it will die. 

‘My feeling is it’s lower,’ Dr Horby added. ‘We’re probably missing this iceberg of milder cases. But that’s the current circumstance we’re in.

‘Two per cent case fatality rate is comparable to the Spanish Flu pandemic in 1918 so it is a significant concern globally.’

How does the virus spread?

The illness can spread between people just through coughs and sneezes, making it an extremely contagious infection. And it may also spread even before someone has symptoms.

It is believed to travel in the saliva and even through water in the eyes, therefore close contact, kissing, and sharing cutlery or utensils are all risky. 

Originally, people were thought to be catching it from a live animal market in Wuhan city. But cases soon began to emerge in people who had never been there, which forced medics to realise it was spreading from person to person.

There is now evidence that it can spread third hand – to someone from a person who caught it from another person.

What does the virus do to you? What are the symptoms?

Once someone has caught the COVID-19 virus it may take between two and 14 days, or even longer, for them to show any symptoms – but they may still be contagious during this time.

If and when they do become ill, typical signs include a runny nose, a cough, sore throat and a fever (high temperature). The vast majority of patients will recover from these without any issues, and many will need no medical help at all.

In a small group of patients, who seem mainly to be the elderly or those with long-term illnesses, it can lead to pneumonia. Pneumonia is an infection in which the insides of the lungs swell up and fill with fluid. It makes it increasingly difficult to breathe and, if left untreated, can be fatal and suffocate people.

Figures are showing that young children do not seem to be particularly badly affected by the virus, which they say is peculiar considering their susceptibility to flu, but it is not clear why. 

What have genetic tests revealed about the virus? 

Scientists in China have recorded the genetic sequences of around 19 strains of the virus and released them to experts working around the world. 

This allows others to study them, develop tests and potentially look into treating the illness they cause.   

Examinations have revealed the coronavirus did not change much – changing is known as mutating – much during the early stages of its spread.

However, the director-general of China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Gao Fu, said the virus was mutating and adapting as it spread through people.

This means efforts to study the virus and to potentially control it may be made extra difficult because the virus might look different every time scientists analyse it.   

More study may be able to reveal whether the virus first infected a small number of people then change and spread from them, or whether there were various versions of the virus coming from animals which have developed separately.

How dangerous is the virus?  

The virus has a death rate of around two per cent. This is a similar death rate to the Spanish Flu outbreak which, in 1918, went on to kill around 50million people.

Experts have been conflicted since the beginning of the outbreak about whether the true number of people who are infected is significantly higher than the official numbers of recorded cases. Some people are expected to have such mild symptoms that they never even realise they are ill unless they’re tested, so only the more serious cases get discovered, making the death toll seem higher than it really is.

However, an investigation into government surveillance in China said it had found no reason to believe this was true.

Dr Bruce Aylward, a World Health Organization official who went on a mission to China, said there was no evidence that figures were only showing the tip of the iceberg, and said recording appeared to be accurate, Stat News reported.

Can the virus be cured? 

The COVID-19 virus cannot be cured and it is proving difficult to contain.

Antibiotics do not work against viruses, so they are out of the question. Antiviral drugs can work, but the process of understanding a virus then developing and producing drugs to treat it would take years and huge amounts of money.

No vaccine exists for the coronavirus yet and it’s not likely one will be developed in time to be of any use in this outbreak, for similar reasons to the above.

The National Institutes of Health in the US, and Baylor University in Waco, Texas, say they are working on a vaccine based on what they know about coronaviruses in general, using information from the SARS outbreak. But this may take a year or more to develop, according to Pharmaceutical Technology.

Currently, governments and health authorities are working to contain the virus and to care for patients who are sick and stop them infecting other people.

People who catch the illness are being quarantined in hospitals, where their symptoms can be treated and they will be away from the uninfected public.

And airports around the world are putting in place screening measures such as having doctors on-site, taking people’s temperatures to check for fevers and using thermal screening to spot those who might be ill (infection causes a raised temperature).

However, it can take weeks for symptoms to appear, so there is only a small likelihood that patients will be spotted up in an airport.

Is this outbreak an epidemic or a pandemic?   

The outbreak is an epidemic, which is when a disease takes hold of one community such as a country or region. 

Although it has spread to dozens of countries, the outbreak is not yet classed as a pandemic, which is defined by the World Health Organization as the ‘worldwide spread of a new disease’.

The head of WHO’s global infectious hazard preparedness, Dr Sylvie Briand, said: ‘Currently we are not in a pandemic. We are at the phase where it is an epidemic with multiple foci, and we try to extinguish the transmission in each of these foci,’ the Guardian reported.

She said that most cases outside of Hubei had been ‘spillover’ from the epicentre, so the disease wasn’t actually spreading actively around the world.

Source: Read Full Article