Climate change has a bigger impact on rainforests than logging

Climate change is having a bigger impact on rainforest ecosystems than deforestation – wiping out entire species rather than just localised populations

  • Logging can cause an extinction of a local species, but its cousins will survive
  • The researchers say that climate change could wipe out all species of that type
  • They created a picture of the spread of different species within ecosystems 

Climate change is having a bigger impact on the rainforest than deforestation, a new study of mammals in South America claims.

Researchers at the Field Museum in Chicago say while logging causes some local animal populations to die out – global warming wipes out entire species. 

Previously, it was believed the multi billion dollar logging industry posed the biggest threat to ecosystems, but researchers now say climate change has a bigger impact.

Lead author Professor Noe de la Sancha said ‘Save the Rainforests’ is a snappy slogan but it doesn’t tell the full story of how complicated it is to do just that. 

He said they’ve created a detailed measure of biodiversity by looking at the variety of species and their place in the ecosystem, rather than a total number of creatures.

Scroll down for video 

By measuring characteristics like ear, foot, and tail size in species like Euryoryzomys russatus, researchers can quantify functional diversity in large rainforests

His new study examined the way animals and plants make use of the forests, how they interact and the variety of species to determine the impact of logging.

Researchers say if a section of rainforest was cut down, some of the animals might vanish from that area – but the same species elsewhere could survive and other similar species could fill their space in the ecosystem. 

Rainforests are a vital carbon store that slow down the pace of global warming, they are also home to a significant number of unique species of plants and animals.

Before conservationists can begin to ‘save the rainforest’ scientists need to figure out what’s living and dying there, says Professor de la Sancha.

They know they need to restore habitats and advocate for laws that protect land , but not which habitats or what the laws should specifically protect. 

‘When we think about biodiversity, we usually think about the number of species in a particular place – what we call taxonomic diversity’, de la Sancha said.

‘This paper aims to incorporate better measures of biodiversity that include functional and phylogenetic diversity.’

By measuring characteristics such as the ear, foot and tail size of the big headed rice rat, or Euryoryzomys, his team calculated the functional state of the ecosystem.

This is the amount of biodiversity based on the roles organisms play and how many a habitat can sustain.

Rather than simply counting the species in an area it also accounts for what they eat – insects or seeds, for instance – and if they live in the undergrowth or trees.

Phylogenetic diversity looks at how many branches of the animal family tree are represented in any given area.

A patch of land consisting almost entirely of rodents would be considered far less diverse than one also home to marsupials and other creatures – even if they had the same number of species, the professor said.

This approach enabled the team to uncover patterns they wouldn’t have identified using any single dimension of diversity alone.

The study focused on the Atlantic Forest that extends along the coast of Brazil and as far as Paraguay and Argentina.

It is one of the world’s most ecologically diverse and vulnerable regions – second only to The Amazon. 

‘As little as nine percent of the original habitat space remains’, said Sancha.

‘We still have so much we don’t know about so many of these species, which underlines the necessity for more fieldwork.

‘Once we have more specimens, we can improve how we quantify functional diversity and our understanding of why these small mammals evolved the way they did.

‘From there, we can keep better track of biodiversity in these areas, leading to improved models and conservation strategies down the line.’

The Atlantic Forest is the second largest and second most biodiverse forest system in South America

The researcher says the findings in the Atlantic Forest would also likely apply to other rainforests but despite the bad news, they come with a ‘silver lining’. 

‘As long as we have forest – and we need to have forest still – we can maintain biodiversity on a large scale.

‘As long as we don’t wipe it all out, there’s good evidence to show we can maintain biodiversity, at least for small mammals, and the ecosystem services these critters provide.’

Last year satellite data showed an area of Amazon rainforest roughly the size of a football pitch is now being cleared every single minute by loggers.

Rainforests once covered 14 per cent of the Earth’s land, but nearly half has now vanished, leaving just eight per cent remaining.

Most worryingly, if this rate of deforestation continues, experts estimate that the last remaining rainforests could be destroyed in as little as 100 years.

The research has been published in the journal Biotropica. 


Nature is in more trouble now than at any time in human history with extinction looming over one million species of plants and animals, experts say.

That’s the key finding of the United Nations’ (UN) first comprehensive report on biodiversity – the variety of plant and animal life in the world or in a particular habitat.

The report – published on May 6, 2019 – says species are being lost at a rate tens or hundreds of times faster than in the past. 

Many of the worst effects can be prevented by changing the way we grow food, produce energy, deal with climate change and dispose of waste, the report said.

The report’s 39-page summary highlighted five ways people are reducing biodiversity:

– Turning forests, grasslands and other areas into farms, cities and other developments. The habitat loss leaves plants and animals homeless. About three-quarters of Earth’s land, two-thirds of its oceans and 85% of crucial wetlands have been severely altered or lost, making it harder for species to survive, the report said.

– Overfishing the world’s oceans. A third of the world’s fish stocks are overfished.

– Permitting climate change from the burning of fossil fuels to make it too hot, wet or dry for some species to survive. Almost half of the world’s land mammals – not including bats – and nearly a quarter of the birds have already had their habitats hit hard by global warming.

– Polluting land and water. Every year, 300 to 400 million tons of heavy metals, solvents and toxic sludge are dumped into the world’s waters.

– Allowing invasive species to crowd out native plants and animals. The number of invasive alien species per country has risen 70 per cent since 1970, with one species of bacteria threatening nearly 400 amphibian species.

Source: Read Full Article