Children are warned old tweets could harm their career prospects as it is revealed police are recording thousands as non-crime hate incidents sparking fears of ‘disturbing trend’
- Figures show more than 2,000 non-crime hate incident recorded against youths
- Non-crime hate incidents involve hostility toward a person with no proof of hate
- Despite not being a crime, the incidents are recorded in police systems for years
- They can show up on a person’s enhanced DBS checks during job applications
- Conservative MP Sir John Hayes told Telegraph stats showed ‘disturbing trend’
Children have been warned that old tweets and online comments could harm their career prospects, amid reports police are recording thousands of ‘non-crime hate incidents’.
Figures uncovered by the Daily Telegraph reveal police have recorded more than 2,000 such incidents against those aged 16 and under in the last seven years.
Non-crime hate incidents involve reports of ‘hostility towards religion, race or transgender identity’ that are not classed as a crime.
Name-calling between students in a lesson – that does not constitute a hate crime – could be recorded as such an incident, according to guidance issued by policing chiefs last year.
Even if police find no evidence of a crime, officers are still obliged to make a record under the non-crime hate incident system.
These records, which stay on the system for six years, can show up on enhanced DBS checks.
And they could ultimately end up jeopardising a person’s career – particularly in sectors such as teaching and nursing – even though the individual was not charged or found guilty of a hate crime.
Today Conservative MP Sir John Hayes told the Telegraph that the figures showed a ‘disturbing trend’.
Figures uncovered by the Daily Telegraph reveal police have recorded more than 2,000 such incidents against under-17s in the last seven years
He told the paper: ‘I think it is a really unfortunate, dangerous road for the police to go down.
Today Conservative MP Sir John Hayes told the Telegraph that the figures showed a ‘disturbing trend’
‘Nobody should be condemned for every quip, joke or comment they have made through their young or adult lives.’
The former security minister said he accepted the need to collect information with the aim of a prosecution, but said the non-crime hate incident system was ‘incompatible with a free society’.
Earlier this year it was revealed how police have recorded non-crime hate incidents against more than 120,000 people – 2,000 of which were against children.
Critics say the controversial practice of logging ‘non-crime hate incidents’, even after officers decided what was said or posted online did not break any laws, has a ‘chilling effect on free speech’.
However senior officers have insisted it helps them ‘measure tensions effectively and to prevent serious hostility and violence’.
Paul Gianassi, the hate crime adviser for the National Police Chiefs’ Council, also argued that non-crime hate incidents may be the starting point in an escalating process of ‘dehumanisation and ultimately murder’.
What is a non-crime hate incident?
The College of Policing – the police’s professional body – accept that not every reported hate crime incident is a crime.
But they say reported incidents should be to establish if an incident is a hate crime or a non-crime hate incident.
If police cannot find evidence of a crime, but if a person perceives that a person’s actions were motivated wholly or partly by hostility – then the College of Policing say the incident should be recorded as a non-crime hate incident.
The college accepts there may be an ‘overlap’ between a perceived non-crime hate incident and the legitimate right to free speech.
However, the scheme, introduced in 2014 following recommendations by the independent Macpherson Inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence, includes a system of police reporting.
Police say the system is primarily to help preventive activity can take place, and to monitor potential community tensions.
But the reporting system has proved controversial – because these reports can be found on the system for up to six years through an enhanced DBS check.
This can potentially put a person’s career in jeopardy, even though they have not been charged or found guilty of a crime.
Non-crime hate incident reports were introduced in 2014 following recommendations by the independent Macpherson Inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence.
But critics say their use has gone well beyond what was intended and diverts officers from tackling other priorities such as violent crime.
Reports of non-crime hate incidents can show up in criminal record checks for six years, yet there are no grounds to appeal against them.
According to the College of Policing, the incidents will only show up on an enhanced DBS check if it is relevant to the job and is approved by a chief officer.
Assistant Chief Constable Iain Raphael, from the College of Policing, told the Telegraph: ‘Under separate Home Office rules, chief officers must also consider allowing someone the opportunity to reply before information is disclosed, and it should not be disclosed if it is trivial, simply demonstrates poor behaviour or relates merely to an individual’s lifestyle.’
It comes as it was last month announced misogyny will now be recorded as a hate crime by police in the wake of the death of Sarah Everard.
Police forces will be asked to record and identify any crimes of violence, including stalking and sexual offences, where the victim believed it to have been motivated by ‘hostility based on their sex’, a Home Office minister said.
Baroness Williams of Trafford added this would be done on an ‘experimental basis’ from the autumn and it could inform longer-term decisions once the Law Commission’s review of hate crime was complete.
Hours before the announcement, prime minister Boris Johnson called for a change in cultural attitudes towards women’s safety.
The move came after a call by Labour’s Baroness Kennedy of Cradley, who warned of an ‘epidemic of violence’ against women and girls.
Gathering evidence about the prevalence of hostility towards women and girls was crucial to recognising connections, according to Lady Kennedy.
Move comes after Labour’s Baroness Kennedy of Cradley, who warned of an ‘epidemic of violence’ against women and girls following the death of Sarah Everard (right)
Speaking as the Lords considered amendments to the Domestic Abuse Bill, Lady Kennedy added: ‘If we are not recording crime targeted at women, how can we effectively address violence against women and girls and the police’s response to it?’
Reacting to the decision, Fawcett Society chief executive Felicia Willow said: ‘We are delighted that this Government has accepted that misogyny should be treated as a hate crime.
‘Fawcett’s campaign showed there was overwhelming public support for this.
‘It’s essential that women have the confidence to report crimes and that they are taken seriously when they do.
‘This is a major step forward in changing how we understand, address and prevent violence against women – and one that we hope will help change attitudes towards women.’
Source: Read Full Article