Why milk from the milkman tastes so much better: Scientists confirm glass bottles preserve flavour more effectively than trendy paper cartons
- North Carolina scientists tasted and analysed milks stored in different materials
- Their results revealed that packaging type does influence flavour and freshness
- Study follows reports of the soaring price of glass bottles delivered to UK homes
For decades in Britain, milk has been delivered in glass pint bottles in the wee hours by the cheery milkman.
But soaring costs and the pressure to switch to alternative packaging could replace this valued tradition once and for all.
Now, a new study shows milk’s packaging really does influence its flavour – and that glass is best if you want to fully appreciate it.
Scientists found trendy paperboard cartons – which are increasingly being used for milk sold in supermarkets – don’t preserve its freshness or flavour as well as glass.
In experiments in the US, glass and plastic were found to be the best for preserving flavour and freshness of milk (file photo)
Scientists found trendy paperboard cartons – increasingly being used for milk sold in supermarkets – don’t preserve its freshness or flavour as well as glass. Pictured, dairy and non-dairy milk options sold in paperboard cartons
– Glass (bottles)
– Paperboard (cartons)
– Hard plastic (cartons)
– Soft plastic (bags)
Paperboard cartons are widely used in schools, especially in the US, so the findings suggest a switch to glass could help children enjoy their milk more.
Glass and plastic, meanwhile, were the best for preserving flavour and freshness, according to the study, which follows figures last year illustrating the soaring price of glass bottles delivered to UK homes.
‘Milk is more susceptible to packaging-related off-flavours than many other beverages because of its mild, delicate taste,’ said study author Mary-Anne Drake at North Carolina State University.
‘[We found] milk’s taste can be impacted by the exchange of the packaging’s compounds into the milk and by the packaging absorbing food flavours and aromas from the surrounding refrigeration environment.’
To investigate the flavour impacts of packaging, the researchers examined pasteurised whole and skimmed milk stored in six half pint containers.
Aside from glass, the team used paperboard cartons, three plastic cartons or jugs (made from different plastics) and a plastic bag, known as a milk bag.
Plastic bags containing milk – known as ‘milk bags’ – in a grocery store in Ontario, Canada (file photo)
No more pints of milk? Soaring prices threaten to kill off the traditional pint with cost of bottles delivered to homes rising by 22% to 84p – read more
Soaring milk prices could signal the death of the traditional pint
All milk was stored in total darkness to control for light oxidation – which is also known to affect milk’s flavour – and kept cold at 4°C (39°F).
The samples were tasted and analysed on the first day of the experiments, then again at five, 10, and 15 days after.
A trained panel examined the sensory properties of each sample, while the researchers extracted compounds to see how the packaging was intermingling with the milk.
Finally, the samples underwent a blind consumer taste test on day 10 to see whether tasters could tell any difference between milk stored in the paperboard carton or the plastic jugs compared with the milk in glass.
Of the different packaging types, paperboard cartons and the plastic bag preserved milk flavour and freshness the least, the researchers found.
Milk packaged in paperboard cartons had distinct off-flavours such as ‘refrigerator’ and ‘stale’ as well as lower sweet aromatic flavours, while the presence of compounds from the paperboard was also present.
Overall, off-flavours in milks detected by the tastings were correlated with increased migration of volatile compounds (from the packaging into the liquid).
Interestingly, skimmed milk was found to be more susceptible to flavour impacts than whole milk, found the study, which has been published in the Journal of Dairy Science.
It’s worth noting that the milk in the experiment was stored in the dark, which is crucial to maintaining its flavour if in clear glass.
A problem with a clear glass bottle is it allows light oxidation – the chemical reaction of fat molecules with oxygen, catalysed by light.
Because light oxidation impacts milk’s flavour, dairy companies have been switching to dark glass that blocks the light.
Glass bottles are also said to be worse for the environment than plastic because manufacturing glass uses more energy and resources.
This is why trendy eco-friendly breweries are increasingly making the switch from glass bottles to cans.
The science of brown beer bottles: Expert reveals how the darker hue blocks UVs to prevent brews from getting ‘lightstruck’
Beer is packaged in brown bottles to make sure the quality of the brew lasts longer, according to one expert.
Jaime Schier, quality director at Massachusetts Bay Brewing Company, said brown glass is the best material to keep beer from getting ‘lightstruck’.
‘Like Gremlins, but more friendly, beer has several natural enemies, including time, temperature and light, which leads us to the brown bottle,’ Schier told Real Simple.
‘Brown – as opposed to clear or green – bottles do the best job of blocking the part of the light spectrum that causes the formation of MBT from hop constituents.’
MBT, an acronym for 3-methyl-2-butene-1-thiol, is a compound formed when some beer is exposed to light, and it causes a bizarre taste.
When MBT forms in beer the drink begins to smell and taste off, and brown bottles are the best at preventing this, Schier explained.
However, there is no method that can keep MBT from forming in beer 100 percent of the time.
Schier said: ‘Keep your beer cold, and keep it out of the light – even if it’s in brown bottles.’
Additionally, Schier said that beer is not necessarily better if it comes from a bottle, contrary to popular belief.
Cans thoroughly protect beer from light, and keep beer from developing the skunk-like smell that comes with MBT.
‘The other thing is that while cans are 100 percent impervious to oxygen ingress, bottles aren’t,’ he said.
‘The lining of the crown – the layer under the cap – becomes brittle over time and allows very small amounts of oxygen to migrate into the bottle, accentuating staling reactions that make beer smell and taste cardboardy, papery, sweet and dull.’
However, canned beer is associated with an unpleasant metallic taste, unrelated to MBT.
This taste is linked to lubricants used on the seams of cans and imperfect linings, but manufacturers eliminated the taste in the 1990s, Schier said, so customers should no longer expect it.
Source: Read Full Article